A fierce wave of controversy has once again swept through the British Royal Family — and this time, all eyes are on Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. The debate that refuses to fade has returned with renewed intensity: should the Duke and Duchess of Sussex be stripped of their royal titles? What began as a quiet murmur among royal watchers has grown into a national conversation, one now echoing across television panels, newspaper columns, and social media feeds.
![Video] Lễ cưới của Hoàng tử Harry và diễn viên Meghan Markle ...](https://media.vietnamplus.vn/images/7255a701687d11cb8c6bbc58a6c8078502be9761de244ac1e757d55ddcfd46e7c22405e8be37241e9301892e8047ac04/Harry.jpg)
Ever since Harry and Meghan’s dramatic departure from royal life in early 2020 — dubbed “Megxit” by the press — the couple has remained one of the most polarizing subjects in modern royal history. To their supporters, they are brave truth-tellers who rejected a system they found toxic and restrictive. To their critics, they are opportunists who continue to exploit the institution they claim to have escaped. The recent resurgence of public anger stems from a belief that the Sussexes cannot have it both ways: living as private citizens in California while still benefiting from the prestige and privilege of royal titles.
Fueling the fire are comparisons to Prince Andrew, the disgraced Duke of York, who was stripped of his military affiliations and royal patronages in 2022 following his involvement in a high-profile scandal. Many in Britain now argue that if Andrew could lose his official titles due to conduct unbecoming of a royal, Harry and Meghan should face similar consequences for their repeated public criticisms of the monarchy. “It’s a matter of consistency,” one commentator told The Times. “If the Crown takes integrity seriously, then the same rules must apply to everyone — even the King’s son.”
Public opinion is deeply divided. In recent polls, nearly 60 percent of respondents in the UK said they believe the Sussexes should no longer hold the titles of Duke and Duchess, arguing that their association with commercial ventures and tell-all interviews has damaged the dignity of the Crown. Others, however, insist that revoking their titles would be petty and vindictive — a move that would only feed the perception of a vengeful institution unwilling to tolerate dissent.
The debate took a sharper turn after an insider close to the Palace reportedly revealed that discussions about the Sussex titles have indeed taken place behind closed doors. According to this source, King Charles III has faced mounting pressure from senior courtiers and members of Parliament to “clarify the status” of his younger son and daughter-in-law. The King, however, is said to remain cautious — reluctant to deepen the rift with Harry, particularly as efforts to reconcile have quietly continued behind the scenes.

“He’s torn between the roles of monarch and father,” the insider claimed. “As King, he must uphold the dignity of the Crown. As a father, he still hopes for peace within his family. Stripping Harry’s title would be a final break — and Charles doesn’t want that to be his legacy.”
Still, the Sussexes themselves have done little to calm the storm. Their Netflix series, podcast ventures, and Harry’s explosive memoir Spare reignited tensions by airing grievances about royal life, internal conflicts, and personal traumas. Each revelation chipped away at the fragile relationship between the couple and the rest of the family. Royal aides have described the atmosphere as “frozen in mistrust,” with one senior official saying, “Every time there’s a chance for progress, another headline pushes them further apart.”
Behind the curtain, however, there’s another dimension to the story. Some royal observers believe that Charles’ silence is strategic — a reflection not of indecision, but of pragmatism. Removing Harry and Meghan’s titles would require parliamentary involvement and could drag the monarchy into yet another political controversy. “It’s not just a family issue anymore,” said royal biographer Hugo Vickers. “It’s a constitutional one. The King has to think about the long-term impact on the monarchy’s reputation, not just his personal feelings.”
Meanwhile, Prince William is rumored to take a harder stance. Sources suggest the Prince of Wales feels the Sussexes have “crossed too many lines” and that the monarchy can no longer afford to tolerate their continued use of royal titles while profiting from their celebrity status abroad. His view reportedly reflects that of a growing faction within royal circles — younger aides and advisors who see Harry and Meghan’s independence as incompatible with royal tradition.
Across the Atlantic, the couple has remained outwardly unfazed. In interviews, they continue to frame their departure as a move toward freedom and service on their own terms. “Titles don’t define us,” Meghan once said in a 2021 interview. Yet critics note that they still use those titles in business and charitable ventures, arguing that the contradiction undermines their claim of independence.
Prince William Is ‘Resetting the Dial’ on Royal Family Image: Experts – Business Insider
The question now is not just whether Harry and Meghan should lose their titles — but what that decision would represent. For the royal family, it would signal a hard line: loyalty above all else. For the couple, it could be the final step toward true separation — a symbolic closing of the royal chapter of their lives.
As whispers grow louder and the public grows more restless, one truth remains: whatever decision King Charles makes will redefine the monarchy’s future. To strip his son of his royal status would be an act of unprecedented firmness — but to let the matter linger may only deepen public cynicism.
In a family where tradition is everything, even silence speaks volumes. And for now, the King’s silence may be the loudest sound echoing through Buckingham Palace.